Albion, ancient sites, Art, Books, Don and Wen

Dear Don: Religious Syncretism…

breedon (144)Dear Don,

I wish I’d left you copies of the photos… you should see the stones now that there is time to really consider them! I’m betting the lion slaying David has an alter ego… and I wonder how many of the accepted interpretations of figures could be reassigned to the myths of pagan streams?

We tend to forget that many of them were discovered in an age where piety wore a crucifix and admitted of no other valid faith. Anything non-Christian was pagan… and never the twain could meet, though certainly the papal mission had other ideas on that, as the letter to Mellitus shows.

scotland trip jan 15 247
It is something we have come across often enough really… the ancient sites Christianised with shrine or church built upon the older places of faith… the churches with stone circles in their foundations, the hillforts topped with a chapel… We’ve been finding such places right from the start, with that very first trip out to Dashwood’s Hellfire caves and his church set within the hillfort above. The ORC the same day… and ancient site beneath the chapel, and ancient hillfort above… And while we realised that quite early on in our adventures I’m not sure we have even now fully understood the implications of that and how much else it brings into question.

hawk hill nick 005It is so easy to accept expert opinion though, isn’t it… even when the experts were speaking from a world constrained by less knowledge, less religious freedom and the shadow of heresy.

By Norman times I think things were less equivocal; the Church firmly established in power. But anything before that is perhaps worth looking at from a pagan perspective as much as the Christian.

We know… and there is enough history to back that up… that the early Ionian Christians took a more Druidic stance to the natural world and the mythologies still resonated and seemed able to stand side by side with faith. I wonder why it was that we felt a need to divorce ourselves from that and turn towards temporal power?

breedon (46)I’ve been thinking. Yes, I can hear exactly what you’re going to say there… But seriously. The medieval church was fraught with politics and the fight for personal power at the very top. If those with ambition to further their own ends actually believed in the Judgement and in the heaven and hell they portrayed to the people, then their own political shenanigans must have put the wind up their cassocks if they stopped to think about their own chances of making it to Heaven.

So maybe it was ostrich syndrome… bury their heads in the sand and hope … and maybe that is why we turned away from a message of Love for all creatures and for the earth? Or maybe it is just easier to control the masses through fear…

I, however, am currently being controlled by a tennis ball judiciously inserted in my boot again. Quite what the beast thinks can be achieved by this ploy I do not know… but it becomes persistent, as does the gaze of large, pathetic eyes…ani 005

I give in. I shall go and play ball.


Wen and Anu x

8 thoughts on “Dear Don: Religious Syncretism…”

  1. I love this because I think there is much wisdom to be learned from those who were pagans. It is important not to try to discredit that thinking before the time of Christ. Yes, Christ might have been a genuine person in a genuine country and those things might have all happened, but there were many other parts of the world where people were already well established in the things that THEY believed.

    I have often thought about the failure to believe that there were prehistoric creatures living before the time of Christ. This is a failure to see that the world is full of things we cannot all see or understand are even there, but it doesn’t mean that they are not. The story of Christ was likely true in that one part of the world at that one time in history, but it was never the whole picture.

    I am glad to read this because I want to believe that this is a world in which anything is possible, and that in fact, it is not and never had been limited. Thank you both for providing a new view of things that could be very possible!


    1. Christianity may, or may not, be based on real events. That there was a historical figure named Jesus who was born, baptised and died on a cross at the order of Pontius Pilate are the only facts historians agree upon…. the teachings, miracles and mission attributed to him by later writers are all up for debate. Nevertheless, millions have found their own path to spirit through thr religion founded in his name… and it is faith that matters, not facts.
      Christianity is just one of many religions… one spoke on a wheel made of many soul-paths, and we must each choose the one that answers the call of the heart.
      Paganism is still alive and well in many forms. The word ‘pagan’ originally just referred to ‘country folk’ and only later came to mean someone who chose another path than that of monotheistic religion. The life of Nature is more important away from the cities, so it is no surprise that reverence for it should have been closer to the hearts of country folk.
      We do ourselves and history a disservice when we subscribe to the unspoken but prevalent idea that, apart from anomalous pockets of civilisation such as Greece, Rome and Egypt, we were pretty primitive until the coming of Christianity.


We'd love to hear from you...

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.